4 June 2008

New Zealand Order of Merit: new Knighthoods and Damehoods

> LAWS179: "New Zealand Order of Merit (Titular Titles) Bill: My New Year Honours List" > LAWS179: "New Zealand Order of Merit (Titular Titles) Bill" > LAWS179: "Queen's Birthday Honours" Continuing my previous theme, the new honorands with the proposed titular titles: ORDER OF NEW ZEALAND Sir Murray Gordon HALBERG, ONZ* NEW ZEALAND ORDER OF MERIT Ta (Sir) Harawira Tiri GARDINER, DCNZM Sir John William HANSEN, DCNZM Sir Peter Charles MAIRE, DCNZM Emeritus Professor Sir (Arthur) Harold MARSHALL, DCNZM Kahurangi (Dame) Gillian Karawe WHITEHEAD, DCNZM

2 comments:

Graeme Edgeler said...

So you're not also proposing re-renaming the DCNZM the KNZM and DNZM?

And wasn't your Maaori knighthood "Ta" last time round?

And why are we adding a title to the Order of New Zealand?

And I didn't notice a single media report which actually referred to these as being the equivelant of knighthoods (which to be honest happened at one of the lists two years ago as well).

Dean Knight said...

GE:

1. Ah, er, probably? I'll need to check how I dealt with that in my Bill. I think it reverts back to old school.

2. Oops. Typo (internet cafe in Toronto...) but corrected now.

3. No - Halberg had the titular title from the previous honours in 1988 under the old system. Indeed, the practice of no titular title for the ONZ is more profound if the NZOM has titular titles...

4. No - but their accompanyting text boxes in print, in effect, carried similare explanations. carried the

Course Outline

Lord Justice Lawton in Maxwell v Department of Trade and Industry [1974] 2 All ER 122 said:

"From time to time ... lawyers and judges have tried to define what constitutes fairness. Like defining an elephant, it is not easy to do, although fairness in practice has the elephantine quality of being easy to recognise. As a result of these efforts a word in common usage has acquired the trappings of legalism: 'acting fairly' has become 'acting in accordance with the rules of natural justice', and on occasion has been dressed up with Latin tags. This phrase in my opinion serves no useful purpose and in recent years it has encouraged lawyers to try to put those who hold inquiries into legal straitjackets.... For the purposes of my judgment I intend to ask myself this simple question: did the [decision-maker] act fairly towards the plaintiff?"


This course examines the elephantine concept of fairness in the law, along with other contemporary legal issues.

Course Archive

Search Course

Loading...

  © Blogger template 'Photoblog' by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP